One moment's lapse into tenderness will undo everything. There's something in his soul, O'er which his melancholy sits on brood, And I do doubt the hatch and the disclose Will be some danger.
If during that interval he also comes to the decision that it will not be advisable to communicate to Horatio and Marcellus what had passed since he left them, there is nothing to be wondered at. Why or why not. To Horatio alone he would probably not have hesitated to tell the whole story, but with Marcellus, a mere acquaintance, it is different.
Compare and contrast Hamlet with each of these characters. By acting insane he can present a false persona which Claudius may find impossible to penetrate. There, as neither the sexton nor the clown knows him, he is free to talk without disguise, and the most critical disputants of his sanity would be at a loss to find anything in his remarks which savours of a disordered mind.
Claudius will continue to pry into his mind and his very soul. We empathize with Hamlet, because we have often been made to feel uneasy or suspicious, if not resentful, by self-appointed mind-readers.
To show this consistency, it will be necessary to follow his behaviour step by step. Hamlet quickly dispels this idea and, though in less vehement language, eloquently calls upon her to manifest contrition by a change of life, and exacts a solemn promise that she will not reveal to the king what had passed between them.
I don't believe for a second that he was insane. The other fact is that, in the story from which Shakespeare takes his plot, the insanity of the hero is avowedly a disguise; and that while in the earlier quarto Shakespeare gives the imitation a much closer resemblance to reality, in the later quarto he softens down the picture, apparently in order that with his audience there may arise no misconception of the truth.
Ray asserts that "the integrity of every train of reason is marred by some intrusion of disease: His language is erratic and wild, but beneath his mad-sounding words often lie acute observations that show the sane mind working bitterly beneath the surface.
For a while we hear nothing more of him, for he is on his voyage to England. He probably further suspects that he is being secretly watched, and he can be quite certain that his words and actions will be reported to Polonius, that is, to the king.
Finally, Hamlet, Laertes, and Fortinbras are all in a position to seek revenge for the murders of their fathers, and their situations are deeply intertwined.
He intends to assassinate the King. Passing over his reflections when watching the king at prayer with the remark that, passionate as they are, they betray nothing of an impaired intellect, we come to the interview to which his mother has summoned him.
Turning from the dead body, he reproaches his mother with having blurred the grace of all womanly modesty, with having made marriage vows a hideous mockery, and religion a mere rhapsody of words. With them it matters nothing that he should appear in his sound senses; they are not likely to have either the opportunity or the wish to betray him.
He makes Polonius, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern look ridiculous with their efforts to understand the workings of his mind. He cannot even feel safe with Ophelia or with his mother.
For we next find him with the players, to whom he is giving directions as to the manner of their acting. Then comparing his father and his uncle, he dwells on the noble nature of the one, and the vileness of the other; anticipates any excuses she might make by telling her that at her time of life a plea of having been carried away by love would be an absurdity, and that if passion dominated her it was all the more shameful in a matron.
Hamlet only shows strange behavior around certain charactersas well, including Polonius, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, Ophelia, and Claudius and Gertude.
Study Questions 1 Shakespeare includes characters in Hamlet who are obvious foils for Hamlet, including, most obviously, Horatio, Fortinbras, Claudius, and Laertes. How are they different. He plans to kill Claudius--and that is precisely what Claudius suspects. For awhile after this torturing scene Hamlet has no need to assume his disguise.
Feigned Insanity in Hamlet by William Shakespeare Essay - True insanity cannot be controlled but feigned insanity is easily controlled in order to manipulate other people. In Hamlet by William Shakespeare, Hamlet pretends that he is insane to trick King.
In Hamlet, Shakespeare takes it up a notch: does Hamlet truly go "mad," or is the cuckoo-talk, like the play itself, all an act? And if madness is a form of theatricality (maybe with some " method " in it, as Polonius says) —does that mean that all actors are crazy?
Shakespeare includes characters in Hamlet who are obvious foils for Hamlet, including, most obviously, Horatio, Fortinbras, Claudius, and Laertes.
Compare and contrast Hamlet with each of these characters. Feb 16, · Hamlet and Insanity William Shakespeare’s supreme tragic drama Hamlet does not answer fully for many in the audience the pivotal question concerning the sanity of Hamlet – whether it is totally feigned or not.
Madness and Insanity in Shakespeare's Hamlet Essay - In Shakespeare's Hamlet, there are two characters that display qualities of insanity. They are Hamlet and Ophelia. They are Hamlet and Ophelia.
Although they both appear to be mad at times, their downfall (or supposed downfall) is quite different. He talks to a skull, for crying out loud!
It's pretty damning evidence for insanity. If you argue that he was not insane, but merely feigning it, then you can see that, in Act i, Scene v., linesHamlet tells Horatio that he will "feign madness", and to excuse strange behavior from him.An analysis of feigning insanity in hamlet by william shakespeare